AI Compliance & Audit Platform
The only AI compliance platform built on peer-reviewed research. 7 scientifically validated dimensions. Immutable audit trails. Defensible evidence for the EU AI Act and beyond.
Every AI system your organization deploys — from customer-facing chatbots to internal decision engines — is now subject to regulatory scrutiny.
The EU AI Act is in full enforcement. Fines reach up to 7% of global revenue. And regulators aren’t asking whether you use AI responsibly. They’re asking you to prove it.
Manual review doesn’t scale. Generic compliance tools weren’t built for AI. And point-in-time assessments miss the drift that turns a compliant system into a liability overnight.
$2.3M
Average cost of a single AI compliance incident
7%
Maximum EU AI Act fine as percentage of global revenue
73%
Of enterprises deploying AI have no formal governance framework
3 wks → sec
Time to detect compliance issues: manual vs. EthiCompass
Built on Research, Not Marketing Claims
Most AI governance platforms ask you to trust their proprietary engine. EthiCompass is different.
Our 7-dimension evaluation framework was developed by PhD researchers in AI ethics, bias detection, and regulatory compliance. It is validated through peer-reviewed publications — not vendor whitepapers.
When a regulator asks how you evaluate AI compliance, you don’t point to a software vendor’s marketing page. You point to published research.
Our team includes researchers with doctoral expertise in AI/ML ethics, and we maintain ongoing collaboration with academic institutions for continuous methodology validation.
Explore the 7-Dimension Framework →Research published in AI bias, compliance frameworks, and ethical evaluation methodology
In-house researchers with doctoral expertise in AI/ML and ethics
Ongoing partnership with universities and research centers for methodology validation
Every scoring criterion is documented, versioned, and publicly auditable
The Framework
Each dimension is independently scored, fully traceable, and mapped to specific EU AI Act requirements. No black boxes. No aggregate scores that hide what matters.
01
Detects bias across protected groups using statistical parity testing and demographic parity analysis
→ Art. 10
02
Identifies harmful language and unsafe content before it reaches your audience. Severity-classified from low to critical
→ Art. 9
03
Measures whether AI decisions can be understood and explained to the people they affect and the regulators who oversee them
→ Art. 13
04
Monitors PII exposure, data minimization, and cross-regulation data governance requirements
→ Art. 10, GDPR
05
Verifies AI outputs against source material to detect hallucinations, fabrication, and unsupported claims
→ Art. 15
06
Tests resistance to adversarial attacks, prompt injection, and jailbreak attempts that could compromise system integrity
→ Art. 15
07
Maps every AI system against jurisdiction-specific requirements including EU AI Act, GDPR, and sectoral regulation. The foundation all other dimensions build on
→ Art. 9–15
Every flag is traceable. Every score is transparent. Every dimension maps to a specific regulatory requirement. No aggregate scores. No black boxes. No opinions.
OneCheck
Your AI Compliance Baseline
A comprehensive audit of your AI systems delivered in 3 weeks.
What you get
Best for
Organizations that need to understand their AI risk posture before committing to a platform.
Enterprise
Full PlatformContinuous AI Compliance
The full EthiCompass platform for ongoing monitoring, scoring, and audit-ready documentation.
Everything in OneCheck, plus
Best for
Organizations deploying AI at scale that need continuous compliance assurance.
75%
Reduction in compliance violations detected
100%
Audit trail coverage for all AI decisions
Seconds
Time to detect compliance drift
7+ Years
Immutable audit trail retention
“Deployed with a Fortune 500 financial services organization managing 100+ AI systems in a regulated environment. $265K first-year engagement. Live in production.”
See the Output
Risk Classification — ETHI-202
11 / 15 points — HIGH RISK
Regulatory Implications
Critical Findings
Incorrect Deposit Insurance Information
Chatbot states €200,000 limit when actual EU limit is €100,000 per depositor.
Missing MiFID II Suitability Assessment
23% of recommendation conversations skip required risk profiling step.
Key Recommendations
Dimensional Scorecard
EthiCompass
AI Ethics & Compliance
Evaluation Report
EuroBank Virtual Assistant v3.2
Generative AI — Financial Services
Risk
HIGH
Intake
7.6
Score
7.8
Client
EuroBank AG
Frankfurt, Germany
Evaluator
EthiCompass
7-Dimension Framework
Sample Report — Demonstration Purposes
EthiCompass
AI Ethics & Compliance
Evaluation Report
EuroBank Virtual Assistant v3.2
Generative AI — Financial Services
Risk
HIGH
Intake
7.6
Score
7.8
Client
EuroBank AG
Frankfurt, Germany
Evaluator
EthiCompass
7-Dimension Framework
Sample Report — Demonstration Purposes
Dimensional Scorecard
Critical Findings
Incorrect Deposit Insurance Information
Chatbot states €200,000 limit when actual EU limit is €100,000 per depositor.
Missing MiFID II Suitability Assessment
23% of recommendation conversations skip required risk profiling step.
Key Recommendations
Risk Classification — ETHI-202
11 / 15 points — HIGH RISK
Regulatory Implications
Quantified risk posture across every AI system. Board-ready reporting. Defensible evidence for regulators.
EU AI Act and GDPR mapped in a single compliance view. Cross-regulation audit-ready evidence your regulators can trust.
API-first integration. SOC 2 controls. Zero latency impact on production. Scales to millions of evaluations.
Governance that protects reputation and reduces regulatory exposure. One AI incident costs $2.3M. Prevention is cheaper.
Start with a OneCheck audit to understand your risk posture, or talk to our team about the Enterprise platform.